(WMR)—The word from our sources in London is that Prime Minister David Cameron and Buckingham Palace are in full crisis mode over new revelations about MI-6 assassinating the late Diana, Princess of Wales, in 1997.
Queen Elizabeth’s former press secretary, Dickie Arbiter, has been trotted out to debunk information that arose from the courts-martial of two British Special Air Services (SAS) troops, one of whom, a “Soldier N,” claimed to have known that it was the SAS that killed Diana.
WMR previously reported that there were multiple assassination teams in Paris the night that Diana, her friend Dodi al Fayad, and chauffeur and security agent Henri Paul died in a high-speed car crash in the Pont d’Alma tunnel along the Seine River in Paris. A U.S. Navy SEAL team actually took part in blinding Paul with flashing strobe lights from another vehicle, a Fiat Uno, that sped up in front of Diana’s Mercedes. The British SAS team in Paris was a second-operational team prepared to take over if the Navy SEALS failed and also assist the SEALS in establishing plausible and multiple deniability of the involvement of either the British or American governments.
WMR has also learned of a significant support link played by Mossad in Paris involving the hit on Diana and Fayad.
According to our well-placed British sources, the British press has been ordered by Number 10 and the Palace to dwell almost exclusively on the hand-written letter, introduced at the court-martial of Solder N’s house mate, Sgt. Danny Nightingale. Both “N” and Nightingale were court-martialed for possessing weapons and ammunition at their home.
The letter in question contains the allegations of Soldier N’s estranged mother-in-law that “N” boasted that SAS killed Diana and the other vehicle occupants in a British government plot. WMR has been informed that the letter and Nightingale are “sideshows,” which permit individuals like Arbiter and The Daily Beast’s royal poo sniffer, Tina Brown, to cast doubts on the veracity of the assassination theory.
Brown’s latest screed in The Daily Beast is titled, “No, Conspiracy Theorists, Princess Diana Was Not Murdered.” Brown’s husband, former Sunday Times editor Harold Evans, has long been believed by observers to have been an MI-6 asset. Number 10 and Buckingham Palace functionaries are pressuring the media to focus on new photographs of newly-born Prince George with Prince William and Kate Middleton, the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, and meaningless interviews with William. The top priority for Cameron and the Queen’s entourage is to divert attention away from the Diana assassination.
Brown and her Daily Beast staff of reporters are now de facto propagandists for the Obama administration. These media trolls and fabulists attack critics of the Obama administration, as well as other journalists who are uncovering details of National Security Agency (NSA) and UK Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) mass surveillance. The Beast and their colleagues are making maximum use of Twitter and website comments sections to advance their baseless attacks and propaganda memes.
Previously published in the Wayne Madsen Report.
Copyright © 2013 WayneMadenReport.com
Wayne Madsen is a Washington, DC-based investigative journalist and nationally-distributed columnist. He is the editor and publisher of the Wayne Madsen Report (subscription required).
In the two weeks prior to Diana’s death, The British Queen had publicly rebuked her for bringing The Royal Family into disrepute by involving them, through her campaign against landmines, in politics. Diana’s response, also very public, was that;’No one tells me what to do.’ When I heard that at the time I thought I don’t remember anyone challenging The Queen quite so openly and seriously before. A week later Princess Diana was dead. The Royal Family is heir to a tradition of British governance that is as ruthless as it is as skillful in disguise and subterfuge. If this story is being allowed to surface at all, it may be an indication of cracks within the establishment. Might it be time for The Queen to abdicate and allow Charles a few years. Although funnily enough, he has been under scrutiny for the unprecedented step of maintaining members of his own staff in key Government offices. Could it be someone is fighting back? I wonder what her sons make of this. I guess they are as incapable of any sentimental loyalty to their mother as they are of independent thought.