Part I considered the remarkable similarities between Armenians and Jews. They both were socialist, then capitalist, adapting as the need arose. Both suffered genocides and achieved independence as fallouts from the upheavals of the 20th century.
Teflon imperialists
Which brings us to their remarkable ‘achievement’: to (almost) single-handedly occupy their neighbour’s territory, against all odds—and hold on to it—against international opinion, Armenia for close to 25 yrs, Israel close to 70 years. Armenia taking 20% of Azerbaijan, Israel 100% of Palestine. They both insist history bequeathed them those lands, and their tragic ‘holocausts’ justify their violation of international law to ensure their safety.
Both countries have lived this occupier lifestyle on a war footing ever since, and yet prosper even as their nemeses wallow in poverty and suffering.
The world mostly admires these plucky aggressors and has little time for either the Azerbaijanis or the Palestinians. It seems there is little solidarity in the Muslim world, or at least little effective solidarity.
True, there is a Boycott, Disinvestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel, but, so far, it is more just an irritating buzzword than anything with real bite. Trade with Arab neighbours is minimal, but not with other Muslim countries.
This is sad, as Israel’s founders argued Jewish settlers could live peacefully with the Muslim inhabitants, and would bring Western high tech investment and education, providing a win-win situation for Arabs and Jews.
The Armenians made no such empty promises. But the result in both cases has been very much win-lose. The prospects for peace in both conflicts without a radical rethink is zero.
Israeli crocodile tears
Israel and Armenia have minimal diplomatic and economic relations, despite the fact that Armenians have almost as much claim to Jerusalem as Jews, dating their heritage in Jerusalem back a thousand years. Devout Armenian Christian Israelis will be there until the Second Coming.
During her visit to Armenia in 2012, the Israeli Minister of Agriculture Orit Noked stated, “We are like each other with our history, character, with our small number of population and having communities abroad.” But no mention of the main similarities: their common genocidal histories and their common bizarre way to make sure they are not repeated.
Israeli interests have meant cozying up not to their Armenian brothers, but to Armenia’s Palestinians. Although Azerbaijan has not opened an embassy in Israel, Azerbaijan is one of the few Muslim countries besides Turkey, Egypt, and Jordan to develop bilateral strategic and economic relations with Israel.
Economics trumps religion. Along with Russia, Israel is Azerbaijan’s main source of military hardware, supplying Azerbaijan with battlefield aviation, artillery, anti-tank, anti-infantry weaponry, and military training. In 2016, current Israeli Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman supported the position of Azerbaijan in the 2016 Armenian–Azerbaijani clashes by calling it “absolutely justified”.
Only Israelis and Turks can come to Azerbaijan visa-free. According to a 2009 US diplomatic memo made public through Wikileaks, Azerbaijan president Ilham Aliyev once compared his country’s relationship with Israel to an iceberg: “Nine-tenths of it is below the surface.”
Economic secret: no oil
With the collapse of the Soviet Union, Armenia’s GDP fell nearly 60%. Most major enterprises—chemicals, electronics, machinery, processed food, synthetic rubber, and textile—were bankrupted. To make matters worse, the 1988 Spitak earthquake killed more than 25,000 people and made 500,000 homeless.
But the diaspora kicked in, and intelligent leadership (a functioning democracy, unlike neighbouring Azerbaijan) initiated reforms and the development of new sectors, such as precious-stone processing and jewellery making, information and communication technology, and tourism. One study ranks Armenia as the 41st most economically free nation in the world, out of 170 (Israel is 35th and Azerbaijan 91st).
Most import was the rediscovery of agriculture, which went from 20% of the labour force to 40%. Israel, too, prides itself on its kibbutizim and its claim to ‘make the desert bloom.’ Apart from grain, Israel is mostly self-sufficient, though only 2.6% are employed in agricultural production, and Israel has destroyed more farms than it has created.
Neither Armenia nor Israel have ever been coveted for their raw materials. Armenia has lots of mountains, and therefore minerals, but the vast majority of energy is produced with fuel imported from Russia, including gas and nuclear fuel (for its one Soviet nuclear power plant); the main domestic energy source is hydroelectric.
Its lack of oil is a hidden blessing, yet another parallel with Israel.* Azerbaijan has been blessed/cursed with oil, one of the world’s largest reserves, for centuries, developed by Sweden’s Rockefeller, Ludwig Nobel, in the early 20th century.
Back then, it was owned by Nobel and financed by the Rothschilds, with no benefit to Azeris. Stalin came to organize the workers in 1902, and wrote, ‘I’m working for the Rothschilds!” The workers won their demands of a 9-hour day and a 6-day week, but only after 13 were gunned down. Stalin was sent to Siberia to cool his heels. Fifteen years later his vow to “overthrow the Tsar, Rothscilds and the Nobels” came true.
Azerbaijanis benefited from the oil in Soviet times, but no more and no less than all other Soviets. Their standard of living rose as the Soviet Union prospered, as did that of Nagorno-Karabakh, Armenia and Nakhchivan. They all got gas for heating and cooking from the Baku fields, and with open borders and a planned economy, there was no awareness of artificial borders, no serious ethnic problem.
1991 witnessed an eerie return to the pre-Soviet days of foreign exploitation and brutality. Azerbaijan has wallowed in corruption and a brutal dictatorship ever since, supported by scheming US politicians and greedy oil companies (British Petroleum the worst).
Even worse than the oil itself, is BP’s new pipeline slicing Azerbaijan in two, just as much a loss of genuine sovereignty as the loss of Nagoro-Karabakh, but done using “soft power” and in the “national interest.” BP stole much more of Azerbaijan’s land than Armenia did, and Aliyev thanked them.
In Oil Road: Journeys from the Caspian Sea to the City of London (2012), James Marriott documents his trip along the pipeline route from Baku to Tbilisi, Ceyhan and Europe. His courageous Azeri guide, Green Party chairman Mayis Gulaliyev, deflected an attempt to arrest them for their interest in the pipeline. Similar stand offs took place in all the pipeline ‘host’ countries.
Marriott discovered that most villagers, who have 800 barrels of oil/gas hurtling under them on their way to Germany every second, have no gas for cooking, many with no electricity.
The corruption, disruption to civilians, loss of personal freedom and environmental devastation that the pipeline and oil ‘wealth’ have brought are shocking (not just for Azerbaijan, but Georgia and Turkey). None of the wealth reaches the people, and has been squandered by a leadership that consists of the dregs of Soviet power. Though Azerbaijan ranks higher than Armenia in GNP per capita ($16,180 vs $8,140), there is no comparison. Poverty in Armenia is infinitely better than poverty in Azerbaijan.
You can only marvel at the paradox of Armenia and Israel’s economic miracles: better no oil and resourceful, than oil rich and corrupt.
Triumph of the spirit
Both tribes wear their long-suffering history on their shirtsleeves, never letting the world (or the next generation) forget their unjust treatment by oppressors, and their triumph over adversity. This painful legacy has proved the spiritual secret of their success.
Respect, even love, for suffering is at the heart of both religious traditions. Daniel Berrigan counseled Christians, but it holds for Jews: Before you get serious about Jesus, first consider carefully how good you are going to look on wood!”**
Both Armenians and Jews benefit from their religious heritage. Armenians boast that they had the first Christian state (301 AD). Despite the claims by secular Zionists that Judaism is passe, it is the orthodox Hasidim that are increasingly the backbone of the Israeli state, and the Star of David its embodiment, just as the severe but majestic stone churches dotting Armenian lands (where not destroyed by vengeful Turks and Azeris) are a powerful symbol for Armenians everywhere.
The only ‘happy ending’
Which brings us to the question: How can these mythical peoples make peace with the world, their neighbours and themselves?
Simple. By taking a leaf from Pope Francis on Trump’s plan to build a wall with Mexico: “A person who only thinks about building walls, wherever they may be, and not building bridges, is not Christian.” Or, we may add, “not Jewish.”
Both Armenia and Israel must reach out to their respective self-inflicted foes, the Azeris and Palestinians, and build bridges, work out some kind of union. Reinvent the Soviet heritage of genuine multiculturalism. It won’t be easy, but it is the only reasonable answer that will put an end to enmity and unending war.
* * *
*This has recently changed for Israel. It discovered offshore gas, which by international law should belong to the Palestinians, but is now being exploited by Israel.
**Fr Ron Rolheiser, “Nearer to God, the nearer to suffering” Catholic Register, June 26, 2016.
Canadian Eric Walberg is known worldwide as a journalist specializing in the Middle East, Central Asia and Russia. A graduate of University of Toronto and Cambridge in economics, he has been writing on East-West relations since the 1980s. He is author of “Postmodern Imperialism: Geopolitics and the Great Games” and “From Postmodernism to Postsecularism: Re-emerging Islamic Civilization.” You can reach him at ericwalberg.com.
It is unfortunate that Israel still will not recognize the Armenian genocide.
Why does Israel expect others to recognize a Jewish genocide while at the same time it will not recognize a Christian genocide?
As for Israel’s support of “Turkic” Azerbaijan, including weapons sales:
It will end in disaster, just as did the grotesque, ill-fated Israeli-Turkish alliance.
Mr. Walberg’s two articles have so many untruths in them, it is surprising that they got published at all. Don’t media outlets require attributions and footnotes for assertions being made?
To paint Israel and Armenia with the same brush is inaccurate, misleading and downright dishonest. See comments under Part I for greater detail.
Armenians are not occupying Azeri land. They have CONTINUOUSLY inhabited Karabakh as the native peoples of the region for thousands of years. Having already been cleansed from their native Nakhichevan and Anatolia, Armenians know all about what it means to live under Turkish and Azeri occupation.
Upon whose payroll are you, Mr. Walberg?
There is so much erroneous information in Eric Wahlberg’s article that I am forced to address just one:
While Israel was created by illegally occupying Arab Palestinian lands, Nagorno-Karabagh, a part of Armenia for thousands of years but occupied by foreigners (Persians, Tatars, Turks, Russians), was taken back from foreigners during the war against Azerbaijan in the early ’90s.
Nagorno-Karabagh was wrested away from Armenia and given to Azerbaijan in the early ’20s by Joseph Stalin so as to gain favor with a threatening Turkey (the cousins of the Azeris) and to make certain Armenia and Azerbaijan would be too preoccupied with territorial claims to bother Moscow. At the time Nagorno-Karapagh was handed to Azerbaijan the territory’s population was 90% Armenian.
When the Soviet Union was on its last legs, the Armenians of Nagorno-Karabagh declared independence from Baku’s oppressive rule (it was their right under Soviet law). Azerbaijan then launched pogroms of Armenians in the territory and in Azerbaijan. The Azeri government reaction dragged Armenia into the conflict. Armenians won the war, liberated Nagorno-Karbagh and took buffer areas around Nagorno-Karabagh.
Wahlberg promotes the illegal act of dictator Stalin when he proposes that Armenia give Nagorno-Karabagh to Azerbaijan. It’s interesting that Wahlberg doesn’t mention that when Stalin gave Nagorno-Karabagh to Azerbaijan it also handed another part (Nakhichevan) of Armenia to Azerbaijan. During the next 70 years Nakhichevan was emptied of Armenians, thanks to Azeri oppression. A few years ago, I guess seeing that there were no Armenians left in Nakhichevan, the criminal Azeri administration sent soldiers and laborers to destroy Medieval Armenian cemeteries in the territory. The destruction of the grave sites were photographed from the across the border. It’s on YouTube. In other words, if Armenian Nagorno-Karabagh is given to Baku, we can predict that Armenians will be driven out of their homeland and even their grave stones will be shattered to prove Armenians never lived–let alone owned–Nagorno-Karabagh. By the way, I don’t understand why Wahlberg and others refer to the territory by its colonial (Russian-Turkish) name when Armenians, from time immemorial have called this part of Armenia Artsakh.
Re the loss of Nakhichevan to Azerbaijan… Wahlberg should be sensitive to the fact that current Armenia is 10% of historic Armenia. For centuries Armenians have watched as foreign occupiers (particularly Turkey) grab more of Armenia. What is now “Kurdistan” of Turkey was Western Armenia for the past 4,000 years. Kars and Ardahan, northwest of Armenia were also given by Russia to Turkey despite Armenian protests. As a result of these land thefts Armenians have reached the end of their tether: no more bending the neck to the foreigner’s sword; no more inch given to racist, genocidal Turkbeijan. If it’s war that Baku wants, Armenians are ready… and unsolicited advice from a “Canadian expert” should be administered at home to relieve the plight of the Natives of Canada who lead the country in alcoholism, prostitution, drug addiction, suicide and poverty. Mr. Wahlberg, please do “your home work” before advising Armenians what to do.