Beginning with the Clinton co-presidency, US regimes opposed Venezuela’s Bolivarian social democracy, wanting pro-Western puppet rule replacing it.
In 2001, after Hugo Chavez compared Bush/Cheney’s global war on terrorism with the 9/11 attacks, Washington’s ambassador Donna Hrinak was recalled for consultations.
Ahead of Bush/Cheney’s aborted two-day April 2002 coup against Chavez, State Department cables said it couldn’t be ruled out, the incident one of others to follow against him and Nicolas Maduro.
Days earlier, Venezuelan Foreign Minister Jorge Arreaza tweeted: “Venezuela reiterates its denouncement and condemns the continuing aggressions that the US government has directly promoted against the constitutional President @NicolasMaduro, democratically elected and re-elected by a wide electoral margin in May of this same year,” separately tweeting:
“We denounce the intervention plans and support for military conspirators by the government of the United States against Venezuela. Even in US media, the crass evidence is coming to light.”
Like their predecessors, Trump regime hardliners want Maduro removed. International law prohibits interfering in the affairs of other nations, except in self-defense if attacked.
The 1970 UN General Assembly Declaration on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation Among States in Accordance with the Charter of the United Nations (Resolution 2625) affirmed “the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples” in all nations.
It proclaimed their right to “freely determine, without external interference, their political status and to pursue their economic, social and cultural development”—requiring compliance by all member states.
It prohibited the “threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state,” calling for resolving disputes “by peaceful means.”
International, constitutional and US statute laws never impede Washington’s aim to topple ruling authorities in nations it opposes—Venezuela a prime target because of its world’s largest oil reserves Republicans and undemocratic Dems want control over.
Rex Tillerson, when secretary of state, and Mike Pompeo, when CIA director, openly called for toppling Maduro.
At the time, Pompeo accused the Venezuelan president of usurping power and inflicting pain on the Venezuelan people—a bald-faced lie, ignoring US political and economic war on the country still raging.
As CIA director, Pompeo orchestrated months of street violence, falsely calling Bolivarian social democracy a threat to US security, supported by Trump instead of denouncing and preventing what’s going on.
Straightaway after replacing Tillerson as secretary of state last March, Pompeo warned about toughening Trump regime policies against US security threats in Latin America—despite none existing, aiming his remarks mainly at Venezuela.
Illegal sanctions were increased, political and economic war escalated. At the time, Trump said he wouldn’t rule out a “military option” to remove Maduro. Added toughness against Cuba was signaled.
Former Reagan administration Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs Roger Noreiga accused then-under secretary of State for Political Affairs Thomas Shannon of failing to pursue enough toughness against Maduro.
When Pompeo replaced Tillerson at State, he said Trump regime policies can reverse what he called “shortcomings” in Latin America by “get[ting] tough on [regional] hot spots.”
On Friday, Pompeo warned of unspecified “actions” the Trump regime intends pursuing against Venezuela, saying, “You’ll see in the coming days a series of actions that continue to increase the pressure level against the Venezuelan leadership . . . who are working directly against the best interest of the Venezuelan people.”
“We’re determined to ensure that the Venezuelan people get their say.” Maybe he has another coup d’état, political assassination, or war of aggression in mind.
The Trump regime’s notion of what National Security Council spokesman Garrett Marquis called “a peaceful, orderly return to democracy” is all about eliminating it wherever it exists and preventing its emergence elsewhere.
Venezuelan Bolivarian social democracy is a prime Trump regime target for elimination. Another attempt to remove Maduro could come any time.
RSS
Trump regime’s rage for regime change in Venezuela
Posted on September 26, 2018 by Stephen Lendman
Beginning with the Clinton co-presidency, US regimes opposed Venezuela’s Bolivarian social democracy, wanting pro-Western puppet rule replacing it.
In 2001, after Hugo Chavez compared Bush/Cheney’s global war on terrorism with the 9/11 attacks, Washington’s ambassador Donna Hrinak was recalled for consultations.
Ahead of Bush/Cheney’s aborted two-day April 2002 coup against Chavez, State Department cables said it couldn’t be ruled out, the incident one of others to follow against him and Nicolas Maduro.
Days earlier, Venezuelan Foreign Minister Jorge Arreaza tweeted: “Venezuela reiterates its denouncement and condemns the continuing aggressions that the US government has directly promoted against the constitutional President @NicolasMaduro, democratically elected and re-elected by a wide electoral margin in May of this same year,” separately tweeting:
“We denounce the intervention plans and support for military conspirators by the government of the United States against Venezuela. Even in US media, the crass evidence is coming to light.”
Like their predecessors, Trump regime hardliners want Maduro removed. International law prohibits interfering in the affairs of other nations, except in self-defense if attacked.
The 1970 UN General Assembly Declaration on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation Among States in Accordance with the Charter of the United Nations (Resolution 2625) affirmed “the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples” in all nations.
It proclaimed their right to “freely determine, without external interference, their political status and to pursue their economic, social and cultural development”—requiring compliance by all member states.
It prohibited the “threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state,” calling for resolving disputes “by peaceful means.”
International, constitutional and US statute laws never impede Washington’s aim to topple ruling authorities in nations it opposes—Venezuela a prime target because of its world’s largest oil reserves Republicans and undemocratic Dems want control over.
Rex Tillerson, when secretary of state, and Mike Pompeo, when CIA director, openly called for toppling Maduro.
At the time, Pompeo accused the Venezuelan president of usurping power and inflicting pain on the Venezuelan people—a bald-faced lie, ignoring US political and economic war on the country still raging.
As CIA director, Pompeo orchestrated months of street violence, falsely calling Bolivarian social democracy a threat to US security, supported by Trump instead of denouncing and preventing what’s going on.
Straightaway after replacing Tillerson as secretary of state last March, Pompeo warned about toughening Trump regime policies against US security threats in Latin America—despite none existing, aiming his remarks mainly at Venezuela.
Illegal sanctions were increased, political and economic war escalated. At the time, Trump said he wouldn’t rule out a “military option” to remove Maduro. Added toughness against Cuba was signaled.
Former Reagan administration Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs Roger Noreiga accused then-under secretary of State for Political Affairs Thomas Shannon of failing to pursue enough toughness against Maduro.
When Pompeo replaced Tillerson at State, he said Trump regime policies can reverse what he called “shortcomings” in Latin America by “get[ting] tough on [regional] hot spots.”
On Friday, Pompeo warned of unspecified “actions” the Trump regime intends pursuing against Venezuela, saying, “You’ll see in the coming days a series of actions that continue to increase the pressure level against the Venezuelan leadership . . . who are working directly against the best interest of the Venezuelan people.”
“We’re determined to ensure that the Venezuelan people get their say.” Maybe he has another coup d’état, political assassination, or war of aggression in mind.
The Trump regime’s notion of what National Security Council spokesman Garrett Marquis called “a peaceful, orderly return to democracy” is all about eliminating it wherever it exists and preventing its emergence elsewhere.
Venezuelan Bolivarian social democracy is a prime Trump regime target for elimination. Another attempt to remove Maduro could come any time.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. His new book as editor and contributor is titled “Flashpoint in Ukraine: How the US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III.” Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.